Monday, December 10, 2012

The Final Exam is TOMORROW (cue the ominous music)


Like I said last time, I already had two finals last week.  They weren't too bad, and only one (political science) had any essay questions.  I answered the one about systems and chose fascism to discuss, because I really remembered the class we spent on it.  The interesting thing about the English exam is that it's on two different days; we're doing the essay question tomorrow, and our study guide actually gave us the entire question that will be on the test.

The last unit of the course was on writing exam essays, so giving us the question made sense, but I'm thinking now that it was kind of diabolical, too.  All weekend long I was obsessing about it.  According to the prof, the verb in the question is the key to answering it, and the verb in our question is "analyze," which, as it turns out, is the most difficult one.  Actually, what we're going to do is sort of a mini version of a critical analysis.  She gave us a three-page handout by Bruno Bettelheim about what fairy tales do in terms of childhood development and showed us a couple of fairy tales on video.  We also read the Brothers Grimm version of Cinderella, which was a real surprise -- no fairy godmother, three balls, and her father is STILL ALIVE through the whole thing.  That was the thing that convinced me that Bettelheim was right when he said that it's a story about sibling rivalry.  The father goes along with whatever the stepmother and stepsisters choose to do to Cinderella.

The problem I'm having here, though, isn't with Cinderella, since that's not the story being used for the exam.  I never even heard of the story on the test.  It's The Three Ravens, and it's about a princess who swears not to speak for three years, three months, and three days in order to break the spell her evil stepmother put on her brothers (she turned them into ravens).  A lot of things happen during the three years that test her ability to keep to her vow, but she doesn't give up and eventually breaks the spell (just as she's about to be burned at the stake for being a witch!).  I can't make up my mind about what to do with this story, but I'll have to decide before noon tomorrow.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Overcoming Finals Week Frenzy . . . by thinking about grammar?

Teenbeat Club, Las Vegas Nevada, Concert Promo...
Teenbeat Club, Las Vegas Nevada,
Concert Promotion Flyer
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I'll bet you're thinking that I didn't make my full quota of postings, and you'd be right if it weren't for Dr. Toffee.  I asked her if I could add the last four I was missing on the due date, and she said it was okay as long as I got them in by this Thursday, when we are finishing our final exam.  My problem was that two of my classes had both final exams and projects due last week (why they did this, I don't know), so I got behind.  This week I only have my English final, which is working out great for me.  Anyway, before last week I took some time to read a few things, including The Paris Lawyer by Sylvie Granotier.  My reaction doesn't have much to do with the plot, characters, or even the setting.  It's about grammar (I know-- I never thought I would react to grammar, of all things).

I don't know how other people feel about this, but I absolutely loathe fiction that is written in the present tense (for example, "Catherine can see a stand of trees behind the house").  I can't forget that I am reading and just lose myself in the story.  It feels to me as if I'm hearing somebody discuss the story rather than telling it, and this is even more true now, after writing my critical analysis paper where we had to use what Toffee calls "the literary present tense."  So, this was my problem with Granotier's book.  It seemed like a critique of what I would call a real novel.  All the way through I was debating whether or not I should give up on it, which doesn't make for a fun experience.

Strangely enough, the present-tense thing did not bother me much with The Hunger Games, once I started reading it.  It was kind of obvious that Collins was using it because Katniss is the narrator and that meant that telling it in the past tense would eliminate any suspense about whether or not she survives in the end, but I'm not so sure that it would have mattered to most of the people reading it if the book had been in the past tense.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 3, 2012

Say It Ain't So! Not Tom Cruise as Reacher!

Lee Child interview #04
Lee Child interview #04 (Photo credit: Fenris Oswin)
When I was in high school, one of my teachers mentioned Lee Child's Jack Reacher books during a class (I forget what he was actually talking about), and he did such a sales job that I went to the library and picked one up.  I was immediately hooked and read all of them over the next couple of months.  All of the covers say that the screen rights of all of the books have been sold, and I've been wondering how they could make a movie of any of them, since so much of them is what goes on in Reacher's head (he doesn't talk much).  And, then too, who could they cast?  He describes himself as "a gorilla," and a lot of what he does is intimidating bad guys just by his appearance as a huge, homely/scary-looking, unsmiling man (who is strangely attractive to women).  I always pictured him as a way-oversized version of Daniel Craig.

So, you can see why I'm so disgusted by Tom Cruise in the role, right?  You have a character who's really big, doesn't smile, doesn't talk, is supremely logical and self-deprecating, AND YOU CAST "Tiny" TOM CRUISE?  A guy who has got to be the smuggest, talkiest, smiliest, most gullible, illogical actor ever -- and that's both in his public persona and his performances.  I can't stand it.  I'll stick to the books, and it looks like I'm not alone (see the articles below).  One more thought:  Nobody ever calls him Jack, just Reacher (even his own mother!).  So why did the filmmakers, instead of using the title of the book, go with Jack Reacher for the title of the film?  Did any of them read the books?

4 more to go (and, yeah, I'm reading the assigned stuff.  It just isn't doing anything for me that I want to write about.  I checked with the prof, and it's okay.  So there.).
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, December 1, 2012

What's Epic About That?

A pizza hut. The building is in Stratford-upon...
A pizza hut. The building is in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England. It is on the corner of Ely Street and High Street (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I was just checking my AOL email, and there was one from Pizza Hut, offering "Two Epic Boxes."  Basically, they're just boxes of carbs (pizza, breadsticks, and cinnamon sticks:  that's a lotta dough).  So why do they say "epic"?  I watched some TV yesterday (the MAC Championship game between NIU and Kent State; my brother went to NIU, so I watch their games if I'm not doing anything else.  NIU won in double overtime-- which is kind of epic.  Go Huskies!), and it seemed like half the commercials used epic to describe something -- and the other half used "ridiculously."  I don't get it. 

I was switching between the game and a Lifetime movie, and the commercials during the movie used "decadent" a lot.  Didn't the Roman Empire fall because of decadence?  I seem to remember that from Early World History when I was a sophomore in high school.  So if decadence is bad, why pay money for it?  Use these three words in a sentence, and you might get:  "Try our decadent epic boxes o' carbs, and fill out your ridiculously scrawny figure."  Maybe it's just me, but I wonder what words we'll have to use to communicate epic, ridiculously, and decadent, when that's what we mean.

Can you tell that I'm just trying to get all thirty of my entries done for my blog project in Eng 101?  I need five more by midnight next Friday.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Would You Care for Some Cheese with Your Whine?

:- Fred
:- Fred (Photo credit: Rob Warde)

There's a guy in my comp class who sits across the aisle from me, and spends half his time whining about everything, from how hard the assignments are to how the shades are pulled down on the windows.  He has not taken any notes all semester.  I did a peer review for him a while back, and I was really, really, really shocked by what he thought was a good paper.  It stank on ice, as my uncle Gus would put it, and the guy -- I'll call him Fred -- was pretty pleased with his work.  I'm not sure Fred ever reads anything he doesn't absolutely have to.  For one thing, he's the Fragment King.  Most of his "sentences" are missing either a subject or a verb, or they're just phrases. 

So why am I writing about him today?  Yesterday he was whining about his grade (finals are in 2 weeks) and how Toffee expects too much work (totally ignoring the fact that the school requires us to write a certain number of words for the course), and how she thinks we're actually going to revise stuff, and nobody does that for real, right? and HE WOULDN'T SHUT UP. 

Toffee's up at the front of the room explaining how to write answers to essay questions on exams, and Fred is muttering to himself non-stop.  I finally turned to him and shushed him like an old lady in church.  You would've thought I slapped him.  And, it turned out that I just made it worse.  Now he was muttering AT ME.  He got this kind of wounded look on his face, and said, "like any of this matters."  Well, it matters to me, and I'm not just whining, I'm venting (the difference is obvious, isn't it?). 

I should have changed my seat at the first whine, back in August.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I Coulda Been Somebody

The Wrong Version
The Wrong Version
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Got my big paper back yesterday, and as soon as I looked at it, I realized that I should have talked to the prof after I had a revision going.  I knew something was wrong with it, but I couldn't tell what it was, and by then I was sick of looking at it, so I let it slide.  Big mistake.  Turns out it was my tone.  As soon as I read her comment about the tone, I knew where I went wrong. 

Waaaaaaahhhh!  I could have had an A! 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, November 19, 2012

Something I Wish I Had Read-- Facebook Makes You Fat!

Facebook logo
Facebook=a fatter you? (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I saw this story on AOL this morning; it was one of their unlabeled videos.  These always irritate me, because I wouldn't bother clicking on them if I knew they were videos.  I haven't got the time to sit through an ad and a bunch of small talk before they get to the point.  Not to mention that they are always superficial.  Gimme the written word.  I can read at least 3 times as fast as they can talk.

Anyway, this story caught my eye:  "Social Media Related to Weight Gain?"  A recent study has made this connection, which I have been suspecting for a while.  My friends who spend a lot of time on Facebook (especially Facebook!) all seem to be gaining weight, and this started in high school, so it's not the freshman fifteen thing.

I've been avoiding Facebook because it's so boring (aren't other people's ego trips always boring?).  Looks like I got out while the getting was good!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Lillian Hellman's Montserrat

English: Statue of Simon Bolivar in Washington...
English: Statue of Simon Bolivar in Washington DC, USA (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Over the weekend I read a play ("an important cultural product") for my poli-sci class.  My first reaction is that Lillian Hellman's Montserrat would be really hard to watch, because it's about psychological torture.  On the other hand, I'd love to see it on stage, because just reading it gave me chills.  The story isn't original to Hellman; she adapted it from a French play back in the 1940s, but it feels like it could have been written now, especially considering all of the horrible things going on in the world.
The play is about a military officer in Venezuela who is hiding Simon Bolivar (if you don't know who he was, look it up like I did).  His superiors know that he knows where Bolivar is, and they also know that physical torture won't get him to give Bolivar away (I'm not sure that's true in real life, but you have to go with it for the sake of the plot), so they devise a diabolical plan:  they grab some innocent passersby at random and threaten to kill them if Montserrat doesn't talk.  Spoiler alert:  he doesn't talk, and they do kill them, one by one.  The suspense is terrific.  The ending is overwhelming (I'm not going to spoil that!). 
It sure beat the hell out of reading the textbook.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Where am I going?

Resume Design
Resume Design (Photo credit: CharlotWest)
My résumé and application letter are ready to turn in this week, and I don't have much to say about them.  This was an easy assignment (for once!), but now I'm thinking about the kind of writing I'm going to have to do after I finish college.  I still don't have any idea of what I want to do.  I have no career plans yet.  I know I don't want to do anything just for a paycheck, but so far nothing is jumping out at me and saying, DO THIS. 

When I was little and people asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up, I never had an answer, and I never thought that I'd get to this point and still not know.  They seemed to think that I would want to be a nurse like my mother (I think she's amazing for being able to do that -- I know I couldn't) or some other medical profession, but I know I would hate it.  I want to help people, yes, but I know I'm too sympathetic to be helpful in the kind of situations my mother faces every day.  I'd be crying all the time and burn out in less than a week. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, November 4, 2012

It's Finally Finished

English: A map of the fictional nation of Pane...
English: A map of the fictional nation of Panem from Suzanne Collins' "The Hunger Games." (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The final revision of my critical analysis paper on The Hunger Games is done, or at least as done as it will ever be, and I turned it in.  I feel like I've been let out of prison!  I don't have to think about the movie anymore, and I can get on with the rest of my work.  I'm glad that the paper was due now; all the major projects for my other classes are due in the last two weeks of the semester, and having this one out of the way means a lot in terms of time.  All I have to do for English 101 is the application letter/résumé and a portfolio, which ought to be a breeze.  Oh, and there's still a test on the textbook readings and a final exam, but I'm not going to worry about them now.

One thing I have noticed is that what Dr. Toffee calls my "writing process" has changed.  I always thought of revising as being mostly correcting errors, but now I get it.  In fact, right now, I realize that I'm not following the prompt for this week.  I'm supposed to be writing about "The experience of developing and writing" the critical analysis essay, and I really should revise this post to fit that.  But I'm not gonna!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Face to Face on my Horrible Draft

English: South facade of the Temple of Artemis...
English: South facade of the Temple of Artemis seen from the South Theatre in Jerash, Jordan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A couple of days after the peer review on my critical analysis draft, I read it again.  Suddenly, it was horrible.  I don't know how this happened.  So, I went to my conference with Dr. Toffee last week under a cloud of angst.  It wasn't too bad.  She suggested a few tweaks for my thesis statement, and -- for once -- I saw what was wasn't working in the way I had put it.  She liked my explanation of my critical model, especially the parts about Artemis and Atalanta; I was kind of nervous about that, so it was a relief for me.  The analysis has to be reorganized some.  I need to put in a few references to other scenes from The Hunger Games to show that it's not just in the scene I'm focusing on that Katniss is following the archetypes.

All in all, it went okay.  I guess the draft wasn't as horrible as I thought.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Rita Dove's The First Book

Cover of "Bride of the Rat God"
Cover of Bride of the Rat God

This is now one of my favorite poems.  It's so simple, yet it says everything it needs to say about that moment when you first hit upon the book that turns you into a reader.  I'm pretty much a "narrative junkie," with a two-book-a-day habit, and since the semester started, I'm about 30 books behind.  Yeah, I'm reading a lot for school, but it's not like I'm reading stories.  And I've gotten really cranky over not having the time to read for myself.  This is the reason I stopped posting for a while:  I needed to read. 

So, what did I read?  I re-read a couple of favorites, Barbara Hambly's Bride of the Rat God (since it just came out on Nook-- I love that thing!) and Johnny Tremain by Esther Forbes (another Nook download; I read this in fourth grade and it's still as good as I remember), as well as four free-Friday Nook ebooks.  I've been reading Norwegian mysteries by Jo Nesbo; they are fascinating and disturbing.  My sister loaned me her Hamish MacBeth mysteries (by M. C. Beaton), and they should take me through to the holidays.

I feel so much better now.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Peer Reviews

Peer Review opening illo for UA/AU - Canada
Peer Review opening illo for UA/AU - Canada (Photo credit: albyantoniazzi)

Yesterday we had the peer review workshop for the critical analysis paper, and my reaction was mixed.  My reviewer (who said he had seen The Hunger Games) seemed to be in a big hurry to finish, and the comments he made weren't all that helpful, at least not from what I can see.  Along with answering the questions on the sheet we were given, we also had to answer three questions from the author of the paper.  My questions were 1.  do you understand the thesis?  2.  Is there enough stuff about the myth crit model or did I forget something?  3.  Does the analysis make sense?  I think that part of the problem is the way I wrote the questions.  He gave yes-and-no answers, and I don't think he gave them any thought.  Oh well.

On the other hand, the paper I reviewed taught me a lot.  It was not by the guy who was reviewing mine, which was a good thing, since if I had gotten his review after working so hard on mine, I'd be really pissed at him.  Anyway, I think I learned as much from the things in the paper that were bad as I did from the good stuff, mostly because I did some of the bad things, too, but I didn't notice them in my paper until I saw someone else do it. 

Next week is the conference about revising my paper.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Politics, Power . . . and Harry Potter?

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the
Goblet of Fire
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

My draft has hit a bad spot, so I thought I'd get a jump on this week's postings, especially since there's a checkpoint this Friday.  We're reading "literary analyses" this week, and I picked an essay by Philip Nel, called "Fantasy, Mystery, and Ambiguity."  Don't be put off by the title -- it's actually about Harry Potter, or at least the first four books. 

Nel makes a point that reminded me of a whole bunch of things at once.  He writes, "As the series develops, it grows increasingly interested in questions of power:  who has it, who has the right to exercise it over another, who has the moral authority to wield it, and how it should be exercised" (750).  He goes on to talk about the political aspects of the books, and that made me think of my project.  I'm not looking at politics in The Hunger Games, but it's a HUGE part of the book, if not the film.  All the characters are living in a fascist dictatorship, where the people in the Capitol are wealthy and privileged, while the majority of the population (the Districts) lives on the brink of starvation and is forced to abide by the ideology of their distant rulers because the Districts have been made the scapegoats for a civil war that happened over seventy years earlier.  Sounds kind of like Nazi Germany, doesn't it?  And Harry Potter's world is headed in that direction in the first four books, too, what with Voldemort's supporters attacking Muggle-born wizards (I was really amazed when I realized that there are a lot of points in common between the last Harry Potter book, The Hunger Games, and the Nazis).

Since the tv was on while I was reading, I heard probably four or five political commercials before I finished the article, and I saw a connection there, too.  Which was scary.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 5, 2012

The Broody Mr. Bond? Step Aside, Daniel Craig!


I'm supposed to read an argument from the Norton Field Guide to Writing this week, and I looked at all of them, but they all seemed too depressing, so I went to another chapter (on evaluations) and read a 2008 New York Times movie review by A. O. Scott.  The film he's reviewing is Quantum of Solace.  By a TOTAL coincidence (really!) today is the 50th anniversary of James Bond on film, too, so I figure this is what I'm supposed to do. 

My dad is a HUGE James Bond fan, has all the movies (and the books), which means I've grown up seeing them, so this looked interesting.  But the first thing I noticed, probably because I'm working on my draft, was the way Scott wrote his review -- he's basically following the same pattern I was told to use for my paper.  He begins by explaining his "critical paradigm," which, it turns out, is a checklist of all the things you expect to see in a Bond film, then he evaluates (I won't be doing that, just analyzing) how well the film does at meeting each item's audience expectations. 

Well, according to him, it has hits and misses on things like action and gadgets, but he comes to a halt with the checklist when he reaches the category of "babes."  This is because in this film, Bond is just not interested.  Scott writes, "what gets in the way is emotion.  007's grief and rage [. . .] are forces more powerful than either duty or libido" (738).  I saw the film, and I think he's right, but then he goes on to say, "Mr. Brosnan was the first actor to allow a glimmer of complicated emotion to peek through Bond's cool, rakish facade," and this was where I came to a halt. 

No, Mr. Scott.  It was Timothy Dalton who did that, in Licence to Kill.   This is the film where Bond is out to avenge his friend Felix, remember?  Even before that in the film, Felix's new bride makes a comment about how Bond should get married, and the look on Dalton's face is not a typical Bond look (which would be a smile and shake of the head, I guess).  Instead, he somehow manages to convey that there is a TRAGIC EVENT in his past -- presumably his own wedding, in On Her Majesty's Secret Service -- that means he will never get married . . . again (don't ask me how he does this; look at it for yourself!).  If that ain't a complicated emotion, what is?  
Pierce Brosnan? Pah!  Don't make me laugh. 

BTW, my vote for best Bond is Connery, Dalton second, and Craig third.  Roger Moore makes me cringe, and Brosnan (I've liked him in other things) just doesn't grab me as Bond.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Prewriting the Critical Analysis Paper

Rue pointing at the trackerjacker
nest.
I'm supposed to write about the prewriting for my paper on the scene from The Hunger Games.  As I understand it, I need to prewrite two sections:  the explanation of my critical approach (myth criticism), and the analysis of the scene (the one where Rue dies).  I started with the explanation, because I thought that would be the tougher part, and I was right.  When I got to the analysis, I had to keep going back to the explanation because I remembered something I left out.

When I prewrite, I usually just brainstorm, but sometimes I'll start writing a paragraph or two because I have an idea how to handle it, which means that it looks pretty strange.  This is what works for me, though, so I'm going to keep on doing it that way.  The things I came up with for the explanation were:  Road of Trials, death of the mentor (yes, Rue is a mentor, if only for a short time, and this is one of the things that came to me when I was working on the analysis), hero archetypes, the goddess Artemis, Atalanta, virgins in Greek mythology, tricks in mythology, monsters (I think Cato is a monster in a way, kind of like the Minotaur).  There was more that I got rid of.

With the analysis, I had the following, plus a couple paragraphs in the middle that I'm leaving out here:  explain plan to destroy food, Katniss as hero, Katniss as Artemis/Atalanta, Rue as mentor (signals with mockingjays), shooting the apples (Atalanta?), attack/instant retribution, Rue dies - last words, song, flowers, salute (I really want to mention the explanation of this from the book, but I guess I can't), grieving.

I'll bet a lot of that doesn't make sense to anybody but me, but that's what I've got for now, and I may have a thesis already.  On to the draft.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Homeless Students? What About Homeless Professors?

(A note from "Dr. Toffee":  Keep in mind that Rhonda is a fictional character.  The conversation she overheard and describes in this posting is a composite of stories I have heard from faculty at several different schools, and, as far as I know, this has never happened at the school where I currently teach.  However, given the way things are all over the academic world, this could happen at almost any college or university that employs adjuncts. 
And, as everybody who has ever held office hours in a shared space knows, there is no privacy for personal conversations, but people keep having them, even when students are in the room.)

I've gotten behind again.  Last week I read an article by Eleanor Bader, "Homeless on Campus," about how colleges and universities don't have enough services to help homeless students.  She spoke to a professor who had allowed students to sleep in her office so they didn't have to drop out.  This was an eye opener for me, but it paled next to a conversation I overheard last month.

I went to my math instructor's office hours to get help with my homework, and I was surprised to find that he doesn't actually have an office.  He's in a "faculty workroom" during his office hours, and there were a couple of other teachers in there at the same time.  I asked him why he didn't have an office, and he told me that he was an adjunct.  I had never heard this word before, and it must have shown on my face, because he explained that he is part-time, only teaching 3 courses a semester (I later found out that that's full time for professors at a lot of schools that expect the professors to write stuff as well as teach).  While we were talking about my stuff, another teacher came in and started talking to a teacher who was working on a computer, and that's where it got interesting.  I was working through the homework assignment, but eventually I just kept my head down and listened.  It seems that another teacher had just been in an accident near campus, which is bad enough, but it turns out that it was a disaster, because he has been living in his car!    
I guess I made a noise or something, because everyone in the room turned and looked at me.  My teacher looked at the talkers and said, "ahem," so they moved over to the other side of the (small) room and tried to keep their voices down.  The first teacher said she hadn't known that he was homeless, and the one who was telling about the accident said that he lost his apartment over the summer because his car broke down and after he got it fixed there was no money for the rent.  He had been showering at the fitness center on campus and so on to keep going. 
I really don't understand how this could happen.  I didn't want to ask my teacher, but I still wonder about it. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Picking a Scene

Artemis statue in Louvre, Paris, France
Artemis statue in Louvre, Paris, France
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I left my Norton Field Guide in Reb's car, so I'm going to talk about my proposal this time instead of the reading (I'll get to it.  Really.).  Okay, so I'm proposing using a myth criticism approach to The Hunger Games, and I'm going to focus on determining what kind of hero (or heroine) Katniss is.  I've been having trouble picking a scene for the project, and I really wish I could analyze two scenes, because she has a lot of different qualities.  She's self-sacrificing, above everything else, angry, clever -- but not about people, and she's a survivor.  This may sound weird, but I think she really fits the pattern of the Greek goddess Artemis, who is known as the Huntress.  I'll talk more about this next week, but for now, I am stuck on finding a scene, and I think I'm going to have to watch the film again.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 21, 2012

Hit or Myth?

Atalanta and Maleagar
(Jacob Jordaens)

Dr. Toffee has The Hunger Games in the Women's Studies category, but I've decided to use a myth criticism approach.  The way I understand it, I can discuss the characters and setting as archetypes and the scene I select as to where it fits into the pattern of the hero's journey.  What's interesting to me about this has to do with there being few archetypes of female heroes, which means I'm going to have to figure out which one of the male archetypes she fits.  And, since I have to talk about that male to female transformation (for lack of a better word), I'll be generating material for the paper right there!  It's a win-win choice.
Enhanced by Zemanta